Categories
INDUSTRY NEWS

AI industry warns massive copyright suit could cripple sector

Driving the news: AI industry groups are urging an appeals court in the United States to block what they call the largest copyright class action ever certified, warning it could “financially ruin” the industry.

  • The lawsuit, brought by three authors over Anthropic’s AI training, could swell to seven million claimants, each eligible for up to $150,000 in damages.
  • Anthropic says that’s hundreds of billions in potential liability, a “death knell” four months before trial.

Catch up fast:

  • U.S. District Judge William Alsup certified the massive class, relying, Anthropic claims, on “50 years” of experience instead of a “rigorous analysis” of membership and ownership questions.
  • Anthropic is petitioning the appeals court to reverse the decision, warning that the pressure to settle could wipe out its defenses and set precedent for other AI lawsuits.

Why it matters:

  • Industry groups say allowing copyright class actions in AI training cases will chill investment, slow innovation, and jeopardise U.S. AI ‘leadership’.
  • “The technology industry cannot withstand such devastating litigation,” wrote the Consumer Technology Association and Computer & Communications Industry Association.

Between the lines:

  • Authors’ groups, including the Electronic Frontier Foundation, American Library Association, and Authors Alliance, also back Anthropic’s appeal.
  • They argue copyright suits are a poor fit for class actions:
    • Determining rights for millions of works is messy, orphan works, partial rights, defunct publishers, and deceased authors complicate ownership.
    • The court’s opt-out plan risks excluding authors who never hear about the case.
    • Google’s past $34.5m effort to build a “Books Rights Registry” shows how costly identifying rights holders can be.

The bottom line:
Both AI industry advocates and some author groups warn the current case risks forcing settlements without answering fundamental questions about AI training and copyright, leaving everyone in the dark.

Categories
INDUSTRY NEWS

Getty Images versus Stability AI

The first major copyright trial of the generative AI industry has begun in London.

Getty Images versus Stability AI is a courtroom battle that could decide the future relationship between copyright holders and generative AI firms. 

Getty claims that Stability AI, while developing its image maker Stable Diffusion, took part in ‘brazen infringement’ of Getty’s image collection ‘on a staggering scale’. 

‘What Stability did was inappropriate,’ said Getty CEO Craig Peters in 2023. 

He said copyright holders, creators and owners of intellectual property should grant permission to any AI firm that wishes to use their works to train their models. 

‘The problem is when AI companies like Stability AI want to use those works without payment,’ says, Lindsay Lane, Getty’s trial lawyer.

This trial is about ‘straightforward enforcement of intellectual property rights’, including copyright, trademark and database rights.

Lanes says Getty Images ‘recognises that the AI industry is a force for good but that doesn’t justify those developing AI models to ride roughshod over intellectual property rights’.

Stability AI has a completely different view. 

Lawyers for the AI image maker argue that Getty’s claims ‘represent an overt threat to Stability’s entire business, and the wider generative AI industry’ and that ‘only a tiny proportion’ of the outputs of its AI image-generator ‘look at all similar’ to images stored on Getty’s databases. 

Stephen Conmy, editorial director of Contenseo, says the trial is very significant. ‘The AI developers want copyright exemptions to train their AI models, which remains unlikely to happen. However, the decision of the trial judge will strengthen the hand of either side in the ongoing, worldwide legal battles between copyright holders and AI developers.’

Interesting fact

Sean Parker, former president of Facebook, is chair of Stability’s board and a significant investor in the company. Parker is very familiar with copyright violation court cases, having been the co-founder of the music streaming site Napster, which was sued by Metallica over copyright violations.

Categories
INDUSTRY NEWS

ProRataAI signs over 500 content licensing deals

ProRataAI, developer of Gist.ai, the first AI search engine built entirely on licensed content, now has over 500 licensed publications powering Gist.ai’s answers. 

Recent content licensing deals include Fast Company, The New Republic, The Philadelphia Inquirer, Boston Globe Media, New York Magazine, Frommer’s, Reader’s Digest, The Nation, Newsday, and Tom’s Guide. 

“Gist.ai answers every query using 100 percent licensed content so consumers get authoritative, accurate answers and publishers share in the value their important journalism creates,” says Bill Gross, CEO of ProRata (pictured).

“We prove that generative AI can both honor creators and deliver an outstanding user experience.”

Compensation for copyright holders 

ProRata’s patent-pending attribution system analyses AI-generated content, identifies the value provided by individual sources, and calculates proportional compensation for contributors.

“AI driven search does not have to be based on theft; publishers can, and should, be compensated for the use of their copyrighted material,” said Pauline Frommer, co-president of Frommer Media LLC. “That’s the ethical business model ProRata is pioneering, and why we at Frommer’s, are proud to partner with them.”

Andrew Min, VP, Global Partnerships and Licensing at publishing house Future, says, “Our collaboration with Gist.ai allows us to distribute our specialist content across new and innovative platforms, helping more people find accurate information from sources they can trust.”

High-quality content deals 

Other content licensing deals with Gist.ai include Vox Media (owner of New York Magazine, The Verge, Vox, and Eater), Spanish news agency EFE, Spanish-language publisher PRISA Media, and various publications from Johns Hopkins University Press. 

ProRata also recently introduced ProRata Ads, an advertising platform leveraging high-quality content to embed relevant ads within AI-generated answers. Early tests on partner websites have shown increases in click-through rates and user engagement, says ProRata. 

About ProRata

Founded in 2024 by Bill Gross, ProRata develops ethical AI solutions that ensure content owners are credited and compensated for the use of their work. The firm’s leadership team includes former executives and engineers from Microsoft, Google, and Meta. ProRata is backed by investors and partners, including, Mayfield Fund, Revolution Ventures, Prime Movers Lab, dmg media, BOLD Capital, XPV-Exponential Ventures, Calibrate Ventures, MVP Ventures, and Idealab Studio. More information is available at ProRata.ai.

Categories
INDUSTRY NEWS

AI machines cannot claim copyright in the US

A US federal appeals court has ruled that a machine cannot be named as the author of a work, when a human submits it to the U.S. Copyright Office.

On March 18, 2025, a D.C. federal appeals court ruled in Thaler v. Perlmutter that the Copyright Office was right to reject Dr. Stephen Thaler’s claim for an AI-generated image called ‘A Recent Entrance to Paradise’ (pictured). 

Thaler, a computer scientist, built a generative AI called the ‘Creativity Machine’, which produced the image on its own.

Thaler then tried to register the copyright of the image. He listed the ‘Creativity Machine’ as the sole author and himself as the owner of the work.

The Copyright Office rejected Thaler’s application, citing its long-standing rule that only works made by humans can get copyright. 

Thaler appealed, but the federal court upheld the decision.

“The Creativity Machine cannot be the recognised author of a copyrighted work because the Copyright Act of 1976 requires all eligible work to be authored in the first instance by a human being,” said Circuit Judge Patricia A. Millett.

AI can help humans, but not be the sole creator

There are, however, nuances when it comes to the use of AI and creating ‘work’.

In January 2025, a U.S. Copyright Office report declared that creators and artists can copyright works made with the help of AI. 

An AI-assisted work may be copyrightable if the creator’s handiwork is perceptible. 

A human adapting an AI-generated output with “creative arrangements or modifications” could also allow it copyright protections.


Categories
INDUSTRY NEWS

Hollywood fights back against Google and OpenAI

As AI and tech giants push for unrestricted access to limitless training data, a battle is brewing between the world’s top creators and the ever-hungry language models that thrive on human creativity.

Two of the planet’s most powerful AI developers, OpenAI and Google, recently submitted letters to the White House Office of Science and Technology, responding to its request for input in the development of an AI Action Plan.

The two multibillion-dollar corporations are urging the Trump administration to grant them the freedom to disregard copyright laws, allowing them to use any material they choose to train their language models.

OpenAI argues that the U.S. will lose its competitive advantage in the race to become the world’s AI leader if it strictly adheres to intellectual property frameworks.

Google says copyright is one legal area that will “impede appropriate access to data necessary for training leading models.” 

Major Hollywood figures were quick to push back on these calls. Nearly 500 actors and creatives signed a letter arguing that “America’s global AI leadership must not come at the expense of our essential creative industries.

It is clear that Google (valued at $2 trillion) and OpenAI (valued at over $157 billion) are arguing for a special government exemption so they can freely exploit America’s creative and knowledge industries

“AI companies are asking to undermine this economic and cultural strength by weakening copyright protections for the films, television series, artworks, writing, music, and voices used to train AI models at the core of multi-billion dollar corporate valuations.” 

Read the full letter below.

We, the members of America’s entertainment industry — representing an intersection of cinematographers, directors, producers, actors, writers, studios, production companies, musicians, composers, costume, sound & production designers, editors, gaffers, union and Academy Members, and other industrious, creative content professionals – submit this unified statement in response to the Administration’s request for input on the AI Action Plan. 

America didn’t become a global cultural powerhouse by accident. Our success stems directly from our fundamental respect for IP and copyright that rewards creative risk-taking by talented and hardworking Americans.

We firmly believe that America’s global AI leadership must not come at the expense of our essential creative industries. America’s arts and entertainment industry supports over 2.3 million American jobs with over $229 billion in wages annually, while providing the foundation for American democratic influence and soft power abroad. But AI companies are asking to undermine this economic and cultural strength by weakening copyright protections for the films, television series, artworks, writing, music, and voices used to train AI models at the core of multi-billion dollar corporate valuations.  

Make no mistake: this issue goes well beyond the entertainment industry, as the right to train AI on all copyright-protected content impacts all of America’s knowledge industries. When tech and AI companies demand unfettered access to all data and information, they’re not just threatening movies, books, and music, but the work of all writers, publishers, photographers, scientists, architects, engineers, designers, doctors, software developers, and all other professionals who work with computers and generate intellectual property. These professions are the core of how we discover, learn, and share knowledge as a society and as a nation. This issue is not just about AI leadership or about economics and individual rights, but about America’s continued leadership in creating and owning valuable intellectual property in every field.

For nearly 250 years, U.S. copyright law has balanced creator’s rights with the needs of the public, creating the world’s most vibrant creative economy.

It is clear that Google (valued at $2 trillion) and OpenAI (valued at over $157 billion) are arguing for a special government exemption so they can freely exploit America’s creative and knowledge industries, despite their substantial revenues and available funds. There is no reason to weaken or eliminate the copyright protections that have helped America flourish. Not when AI companies can use our copyrighted material by simply doing what the law requires: negotiating appropriate licenses with copyright holders — just as every other industry does. Access to America’s creative catalog of films, writing, video content, and music is not a matter of national security. They do not require a government-mandated exemption from existing U.S. copyright law.

America didn’t become a global cultural powerhouse by accident. Our success stems directly from our fundamental respect for IP and copyright that rewards creative risk-taking by talented and hardworking Americans from every state and territory. For nearly 250 years, U.S. copyright law has balanced creator’s rights with the needs of the public, creating the world’s most vibrant creative economy. We recommend that the American AI Action Plan uphold existing copyright frameworks to maintain the strength of America’s creative and knowledge industries, as well as American cultural influence abroad.


Categories
INDUSTRY NEWS

Created by Humans in the AI era

A coalition of American novelists and authors is banding together to safeguard their intellectual property and prevent AI companies from pilfering their works to train language models, thereby preserving the copyright and integrity of their creative output.

“Authors must come together now and negotiate with AI companies as a block,” said novelist Doug Preston in an interview with Fortune.com. 

Preston says he has published at least 40 books, all of which he has discovered have been used by AI firms to train their models without his consent. 

Violation

This violation of his copyright led him to believe that authors and AI developers need some sort of licensing system that protects both parties from copyright infringement. 

That’s where the startup Created by Humans (CbH) comes in. 

Created by Humans was launched in June 2024 and acts as a licensing service for authors. It is a licensing bridge between authors and AI developers. 

“Authors can sign up, claim their works, and note the licenses they’d like to grant to AI developers,” said Jen Singerman, co-founder and COO of Created by Humans.  

Why this matters

Creators of all kinds are increasingly frustrated with how their work is being used by AI firms without their permission. 

According to CbH, over 100 authors have signed up to the service (as of January 2025). 

The Authors Guild, a professional group representing over 15,000 authors, including its former president Preston, has partnered with Created by Humans since October 2024.

“We urgently need to give control back to authors and their publishers, and licensing is the means to accomplish that going forward,” said Mary Rasenberger, Authors Guild’s CEO.

Money for work

Preston notes that AI licensing could be a lucrative opportunity for authors, as AI companies rely on books to train their large language models, and require repeated ingestion of new texts with each model iteration. 

The CEO of Created by Humans, Trip Adler, claims CbH is currently AI licensing a book every five minutes. 

Industry pricing models

The big question is, how much can authors charge AI companies when licensing their work? There are four pricing models currently in  place. 

Flat fee – A one-time payment for access to an author’s catalog (e.g., $50,000 – $500,000+ depending on content volume and uniqueness).

Per-word rate – AI firms sometimes pay per million words (e.g., $1,000 – $10,000 per million words, based on exclusivity and quality).

Revenue share – Authors receive a percentage of the revenue AI firms generate using their content.

Tiered pricing – Authors charge different rates based on usage (e.g., research vs. commercial use).

In November 2024, the Authors Guild disclosed that HarperCollins, a leading publisher under NewsCorp, had entered into an agreement with Microsoft, allowing the tech giant to use select HarperCollins nonfiction titles to train its AI models. The deal priced each title at $5,000 for a three-year period of training rights.

Fundraising 

Created by Humans has raised a total of $11 million in funding, including a $5.5 million seed round led by Giant Ventures. 

Investors include 

  • Slack co-founder Cal Henderson
  • Emmett Shear, co-founder of Twitch and interim CEO of OpenAI
  • Kyle Vogt, co-founder of Cruise Automation
  • Dropbox co-founder Drew Houston
  • Cameron Yarbrough, Torch’s co-founder. 
  • Uncommon Capital
  • The pre-seed round, led by Floodgate and Craft Ventures, collected $5.5 million in June, 2024.

Pictured are Created by Humans founders Jen Singerman (left), Trip Adler (centre), and Edward Igushev (right).


Categories
INDUSTRY INSIGHTS INDUSTRY NEWS

‘Creative Rights in AI Coalition’ calls on UK government to protect copyright

As artificial intelligence (AI) continues to revolutionise the way we produce, consume, and interact with content, a newly formed alliance is taking a stand to ensure that creativity and technology can thrive side-by-side.

The Creative Rights in AI Coalition, a broad-based group that brings together publishers, authors, artists, music professionals, specialist interest publications, unions, and photographers.

Their united goal?

To spur growth in both the creative and tech sectors by protecting copyright and establishing a fair, transparent framework for generative AI (GAI).

Three key principles

At the heart of the coalition’s message are three key principles for AI policy. These principles underscore the need for a dynamic licensing market and a robust copyright environment.

They also emphasise the importance of control and transparency for content creators, while envisioning a future that drives innovation and fosters long-term prosperity for the UK’s creative and tech industries.

The coalition isn’t just making a philosophical statement—it’s backed by the voice of the public. Fresh data from a YouGov poll commissioned by Reset Tech reveals a clear mandate from UK adults:

72% believe AI companies should pay royalties to creators whose text, audio, or video work trains AI models.

80% think AI firms should publicly disclose the source material used to train their systems.

These findings align with the coalition’s call for meaningful, future-facing policies.

Balanced innovation

If the UK aims to maintain its status as a global leader in creative output—an industry generating over £100 billion each year—then the coalition believes it must set a standard for balanced innovation.

Copyright protections, fair compensation, and transparent practices are not just ethical considerations; they are vital economic levers that can ensure both sectors flourish.

In a statement, the coalition notes that the UK has a unique opportunity to shape global standards for AI and creativity.

By building a fair licensing market and safeguarding the rights of creators, the UK can foster an environment in which both cutting-edge technology and brilliant artistic work thrive.

It’s a vision of cooperation, not conflict—one that encourages all players, from government policymakers to tech innovators, to contribute to a balanced and sustainable ecosystem.

Growth through well-structured licensing agreements

The coalition’s principles offer a roadmap for achieving that balance. They speak to creators’ need for control over their work, establishing trust through transparency, and incentivising growth through well-structured licensing agreements.

By adopting these principles, the government can help ensure that both creative and tech sectors continue to drive growth, delivering value to audiences and strengthening the UK’s position on the global stage.

With the Creative Rights in AI Coalition now assembled, all eyes turn to the government’s imminent consultation.

It’s an opportunity to set a tone of constructive partnership rather than contention.

“By embracing robust copyright protections, promoting fair remuneration, and demanding transparency, UK policy can help lead the way, ensuring that the next wave of AI innovation uplifts and honors human creativity instead of leaving it behind,” says Stephen Conmy, founder of Contenseo.


Categories
INDUSTRY NEWS

AI developers must reveal copyright violations

Big news for creators, publishers, content owners and copyright holders. 

The United States has a new bill that aims to protect copyright holders and creators in the age of AI. 

Following many high profile lawsuits accusing generative AI developers of using copyrighted content to train their language models, the “Generative AI Copyright Disclosure Act of 2024,” was introduced by Rep. Adam Schiff. (April 10, 2024)

The Copyright Disclosure Act explained

The Copyright Disclosure Act aims to clarify how AI developers can use copyrighted material. 

Under this new law, anyone creating or updating AI training data must inform the Register of Copyrights if they use copyrighted works. 

The essence of the new law is all about transparency. 

Anyone creating or updating AI training data must inform the Register of Copyrights if they use copyrighted works. 

They must submit a summary of all copyright material used before their AI system is publicly launched. 

And finally, if they don’t send such information to the Register of Copyrights, they will be fined. 

“We’re at a crossroads where respect for intellectual property and technological innovation must coexist,” Schiff asserts, on the bill’s core mission.

In summary

To promote transparency and ensure proper copyright use, the bill establishes key requirements:

  • Detailed summaries: Creators must provide comprehensive summaries of any copyrighted material included in AI training datasets.
  • Timely filings: Submission deadlines are set to guarantee notices are filed well before AI systems are publicly launched.

Financial deterrence: To emphasise the importance of compliance, financial penalties are in place for those who fail to meet these requirements.

Read more: The Generative AI Copyright Disclosure Act of 2024

Categories
INDUSTRY NEWS

A fascinating evolution – the next stages of content licensing

The next stages of content licensing are likely to be shaped by a number of factors, including technological advancements, changing consumer behavior, and the evolving needs of creators and distributors.

Here are some potential trends and developments that could influence the evolution of content licensing.

Personalisation and customisation

With the rise of streaming services, consumers are familiar with and increasingly looking for personalised content recommendations. 

Content licensing will need to adapt to accommodate deeper personalisation, allowing for more granular control over the distribution and monetisation of content, particularly video and audio content. As for the wider news and information markets, information overload is a major hurdle for media consumers, but news personalisation offers a lifeline.

“It helps them cut through the clutter and focus on what truly matters – timely, relevant news. This curated experience fosters loyalty, benefiting both readers and publishers,” says Stephen Conmy, editorial director with Contenseo.

AI-powered content discovery

Artificial intelligence (AI) can help identify patterns in consumer behavior, preferences, reading, listening, and viewing habits. This could lead to more targeted content licensing agreements, where content creators and distributors can better understand what audiences want and tailor their content accordingly.

“For brands that license content, the future rests on building meaningful relationships with engaged audiences and licensing authentic, high-quality content,” says Conmy.

Dynamic content licensing

As streaming and podcasting services continue to grow, there may be a greater emphasis on dynamic content licensing, where content is licensed on a per-title or per-episode basis, rather than as part of a larger package.“Contenseo has dynamic licensing in its DNA,” says Conmy. “This next generation of content licensing offers dynamic and affordable licencing with a few clicks of a mouse. It also gives smaller publishers and less-well-known creators to make their work available at an international level.”

Globalisation and localisation

As global streaming services expand, content licensing will need to accommodate diverse cultural and linguistic requirements. This will involve more localised content creation, dubbing, and subtitling.

“In today’s interconnected world, copyright holders and creators must expand their reach beyond borders. Content localisation bridges the gap, ensuring your content resonates with global audiences across languages and cultures,” says Conmy.

Blockchain and decentralised content licensing

Blockchain technology can disrupt the traditional content licensing model by enabling decentralised, secure, and transparent transactions. This will lead to new business models and revenue streams for content creators and distributors.

More emphasis on data-driven decision-making

As data analytics become more sophisticated, content licensing decisions may be driven more by data-driven insights rather than intuition or traditional industry practices.

New business models and revenue streams

The rise of streaming services has created new opportunities for content creators and distributors to experiment with innovative business models, such as subscription-based services, ad-supported models, or transactional VOD.

Global content collaborations

The creation of more international co-productions and collaborations may lead to more complex content licensing agreements, requiring greater flexibility and adaptability from all parties involved.

“This is where a system like Contenseo can play a vital role,” says Conmy. “Contenseo connects the copyright holder with the licensee (buyer) and facilitates swift and secure, dynamic licensing agreements. It’s how content licensing should be, more transactional and less time-consuming.” 

Categories
INDUSTRY NEWS

Master the rich world of content licensing

There are two distinct features of Contenseo’s system. The first is the ‘Licence Finder’ which allows you to find who owns the copyright of a piece of work and license (buy) the content from them.

The second feature, which we discuss in this guide, is the ‘Licensing as a Service’ feature. This allows creators, publishers, and content owners to set up an online licensing department and license (sell) their content.

As a creator, you own the copyright to your work

If you have published, or stored your work online, you own the copyright to that content.

However, what do you currently do if someone wants to license a piece of your content? 

That’s where Contenseo comes in, it allows you to register your copyrighted works and license (sell) them to licensees.

Such work can include articles, images, videos and podcasts.

What is content licensing?

In it’s simplest terms, content licensing is a legal agreement that allows you to use someone else’s intellectual property, such as written text, images, videos, music, podcasts, or software. 

It’s like borrowing something with a contract that outlines how you can use it, for how long, and often, and for what fee.

How to make more money from your existing content

To make money from your existing content, you need to make it available to license.

How can I make my content available to license?

By using Contenseo’s ‘Licensing as a Service’, you can make all your content available to licence in just a few simple steps.

Step 1: Open your Contenseo account

Step 2: Enter the URLs, the pages on the web, where your content was originally published. For example, if you have an exclusive interview with a high profile figure, just upload the url or web page where the content was originally published. 

Step 3: Add Contenseo’s ‘widget’ or WordPress plugin to your content management system 

Once you complete these simple steps, your content is now available for people to license (buy). 

Contenseo’s ‘Licensing as a Service’ aims to transform one of the world’s largest and most challenging industries.

Contenseo’s ambition is to help content creators and copyright holders all over the world make extra revenue and increase their profiles and the audiences who love their work. 

“We are hyper-focused on building a category-defining licensing system for the creator industry,” says Stephen Conmy, founder of Contenseo. 

A system that empowers creators and copyright holders to take control of their profitability and their destiny.

What are the benefits of using Contenseo?

There are benefits for both the content creator (licensor) and the person using the content (licensee).

Content creators (licensors):

  • Earn revenue from their work through licensing fees.
  • Expand the reach of their content to a wider audience.

Content users (licensees):

  • Use high-quality content; they may not have the resources to create themselves.
  • Avoid copyright infringement issues.

Licensing your content will earn you revenue while you rest

When you make your content available for people to license (buy), you can earn extra revenue while you rest. 

In the simplest terms, Contenseo connects those who want to buy licensed content with those who want to sell their licensed content. 

Contenseo gives the copyright holder a ‘licensing department in a box’ solution that they can simply install on their content management system (CMS).

Once you install Contenseo’s ‘Licensing as a Service’ you can keep track of all your licensing activity and payments, all from one clever dashboard.